To meet increasing electricity demand, TransGrid has announced plans to invest $227 million into Far North NSW's electricity network.
Peak electricity demand in Far North Coast region is continuing to rise at a rate higher than the NSW state average, with demand in the region reaching record highs in 2009.
As a result, TransGrid is planning to construct a 215km 330kV electrical link between TransGrid's existing substations at Dumaresq (near Bonshaw) and Lismore utilising an existing easement to help maintain the region's electricity supply reliability in the longer-term.
TransGrid began preliminary work on detailed field and environmental studies within an original 1-2km wide study area between Bonshaw and Tenterfield in March 2009.
Since then, two additional study areas were announced for further study and community consultation in July 2009.
TransGrid selected a preferred corridor from these study areas in September 2009. The preferred corridor will to assist in determining a preferred route for the proposed transmission line.
The detailed Environmental Impact Statement is scheduled to be publicly exhibited in 2010. Construction is expected to commence in 2011.
Selection of a preferred corridor
TransGrid announced a preferred corridor in September 2009 to assist in selecting a preferred route for the proposed Far North NSW transmission line project.
After an extended period of consultation and feedback from the community, aerial surveys, detailed constraint analyses, focus groups and environmental studies, TransGrid has selected a preferred 500 metre wide corridor for the majority of the proposed transmission line.
The preferred corridor has been selected on the basis that it:
- avoids dense clusters of landholdings
- minimises the number of affected properties
- reduces visual impacts
- has reasonable access from existing sealed roads
- avoids endangered ecological communities, threatened species and habitats
The preferred corridor includes the northern study area option which was placed on display as an alternative in late July 2009.
TransGrid has selected the preferred corridor on the basis that it provides the best balance of social, environment and economic factors considered in the corridor selection process.
Route selection
The preferred corridor is currently being refined into a preferred route in direct consultation with affected landowners.
To view a detailed report which evaluates the corridor alternatives and explains why the preferred corridor was selected, please refer to the Constraints Identification and Preferred Corridor Selection Report.
.
Project Updates
| Project Update |
June 2010 |
PDF |
| Request for Proposals Advertisement |
May 2010 |
PDF |
| Project Update |
December 2009 |
PDF |
| Project Update |
July 2009 |
PDF |
| Project Update |
May 2009 |
PDF |
| Final Report |
March 2009 |
PDF |
| Application Notice |
April 2008 |
PDF |
| Emerging Transmission Network Limitations |
August 2003 |
PDF |
General Project Maps
| Preferred corridor east of Tenterfield |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Preferred corridor west of Tenterfield |
September 2009 |
PDF |
Satellite Maps of the Preferred Corridor
| Preferred Corridor Satellite Image A |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Preferred Corridor Satellite Image B |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Preferred Corridor Satellite Image C |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Preferred Corridor Satellite Image D |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Preferred Corridor Satellite Image E |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Preferred Corridor Satellite Image F |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Preferred Corridor Satellite Image G |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Preferred Corridor Satellite Image H |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Preferred Corridor Satellite Image HI |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Preferred Corridor Satellite Image I |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Preferred Corridor Satellite Image II |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Preferred Corridor Satellite Image JI |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Preferred Corridor Satellite Image J |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Preferred Corridor Satellite Image K |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Preferred Corridor Satellite Image L |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Preferred Corridor Satellite Image M |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Preferred Corridor Satellite Image N |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Preferred Corridor Satellite Image O |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Preferred Corridor Satellite Image P |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Preferred Corridor Satellite Image Q |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Preferred Corridor Satellite Image R |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Preferred Corridor Satellite Image S |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Preferred Corridor Satellite Image T |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Preferred Corridor Satellite Image U |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Preferred Corridor Satellite Image V |
November 2009 |
PDF |
Constraints Identification and Preferred Corridor Selection Report
| Constraint Identification and Preferred Corridor Report |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Appendix A - Connel Wagner Feasability Study (2006) |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Appendix A - TransGrid Needs Report (2009) |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Appendix B - URS Consultation Report (2009) |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Appendix B - TNS Consultation Report (2009) |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Appendix C - Threatened Species - Flora |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Appendix C - Threatened Species - Fauna |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Appendix C - Threatened Species - EPBC |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Appendix D - Biodiversity Constraints Map - A |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Appendix D - Biodiversity Constraints Map - B |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Appendix D - Biodiversity Constraints Map - C |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Appendix D - Biodiversity Constraints Map - D |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Appendix D - Biodiversity Constraints Map - E |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Appendix D - Biodiversity Constraints Map - F |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Appendix D - Biodiversity Constraints Map - G |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Appendix D - Biodiversity Constraints Map - H |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Appendix D - Biodiversity Constraints Map - I |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Appendix D - Biodiversity Constraints Map - J |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Appendix D - Biodiversity Constraints Map - K |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Appendix D - Biodiversity Constraints Map - L |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Appendix D - Biodiversity Constraints Map - M |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Appendix D - Biodiversity Constraints Map - N |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Appendix D - Biodiversity Constraints Map - O |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Appendix D - Biodiversity Constraints Map - P |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Appendix D - Biodiversity Constraints Map - Q |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Appendix D - Biodiversity Constraints Map - R |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Appendix D - Biodiversity Constraints Map - 2A |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Appendix D - Biodiversity Constraints Map - 2B |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Appendix D - Biodiversity Constraints Map - 2C |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Appendix D - Biodiversity Constraints Map - 2D |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Appendix D - Biodiversity Constraints Map - 2E |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Appendix D - Biodiversity Constraints Map - 2F |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Appendix D - Biodiversity Constraints Map - 2G |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Appendix D - Biodiversity Constraints Map - 2H |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Appendix D - Biodiversity Constraints Map - 2I |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Appendix D - Biodiversity Constraints Map - 2J |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Appendix D - Biodiversity Constraints Map - 2K |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Appendix D - Biodiversity Constraints Map - 2L |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Appendix D - Biodiversity Constraints Map - 2M |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Appendix D - Biodiversity Constraints Map - 2N |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Appendix D - Biodiversity Constraints Map - 2O |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Appendix D - Biodiversity Constraints Map - 2P |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Appendix D - Biodiversity Constraints Map - 2Q |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Appendix E - Environmental and Heritage Management Constraints Report (2009) |
September 2009 |
PDF |
| Appendix F - Landscape and Visual Constraints Report (2009) |
September 2009 |
PDF |